Today we will touch on one very interesting topic - the topic relating to the philosophical and therefore is not such an unambiguous: Should the head know the area leading to the specialists in it? I asked this question many people, but the opinions were divided: some say - "the manager must be a good manager - this is quite enough." Others say: "How can you manage in the area in which you do not understand? After all, you can not understand the features, the specifics to take the wrong decision!". Let's deal with ...
In my opinion, the key word in the "problem" question is the word "know". What is this "know"? What is a measure? How deep? Consider how physicists say, private (limit) cases:
The head - an expert in the area, which is headed by the head - does not understand the specifics of the area that leads.
In both cases, we assume that the manager has managerial skills.
At first glance, the first option should arrange both sides: Indeed, if the head of the expert is great - well, not forget him all this? However, there is one nuance here - a certain typical of thinking, because thoroughly dealing with something, the head absorbs a certain standard approach, and maybe it is extremely difficult to rise and look at the same area from above. The second option is also not sinless. The fact is that it is extremely difficult to earn respect for subordinates. Therefore, in my opinion, the only way of "survival" in this case will be an indisputable authority of the manager who can earn and outside the managed area, for example, "knocking out decent working conditions for its employees, etc. However, agree, there will be several Strange, if the head in a new place does not begin with the analysis of the specifics of work, the region, etc. After all, to understand which way you need to move, you need to understand where you are standing right now.
But still imagine the situation that for one reason or another the boss does not understand the specifics. How to be? How to make decisions? The solution is: it is necessary to consult with several experts in this area and on the basis of their opinions and their intuition to make decisions.
Summarizing, I can say that the key word, in the absolute majority of questions and problems is the word "compromise". So here, it is not necessary to unambiguously choose some one dipole position. Therefore, my opinion - the head must definitely know the overall specifics of the region whose specialists are led by, but not as an expert, but as a "advanced user" By all accounts, the number of payment and withdrawal methods does not correspond to the status of a decent gaming site, which casino slotscharmcasino.com has become in the shortest possible time. The range of transaction options should look significantly denser.
